Web 2.0 †Simplifying the Complicated Essay Example for Free

mesh 2.0 Simplifying the Complicated Essay eer since its birth, blade 2. 0 has blend a tempting topic of sm only talk everywhere applied science is discussed. In most cases, those small talks can lead to lengthy discussions, and even debates. The watchword, to begin with, took date before settling with a definitive description. The processes and characteristics are in like manner repeatedly debated about. If there is anything more intrigue with net 2. 0, it is the power that it gives wind vanesite visitors. It empowers web users to become part of the creation of a site, to associate themselves with a circumstantial brand or service, or even with mere ideas. It creates a pool of noesis which fosters collective discussion, which becomes usable for all users. It also creates new uses for old applications, enabling them to be recreated and popularized. Introduction Except with enough interest on technology, meshing 2. 0 is more of a jargon than a utility for many. W hat majority of meshing users do not realize is that they are already using it even without them knowing. net 2. 0 has perfectly taken over the whole computing industry. The takeover was so sudden that even experts agree that this has become the mien computing today should beor depart be.The confusion is forgivable. For many, mesh 2. 0 is a complicated thing. The more experts try to simplify it, the more complicated it becomes. To begin with, it is extremely difficult to at least define the term. There is also a lot of confusion as to where the weather vane 2. 0 begins and where blade 1. 0 ends. Moreover, there is the question if the latter ends where the former begins. To better understand the word, it takes an analysis of the bits and pieces that hand it up. We begin with the internet. (MacManus, 2005 Ding, 2007)The internet is designed to share and give out information. It began as an avenue for data creators and owners to trip their information to others, often specifi c recipients. In review, it has become effective to what it is aimed at. The internet has become a way to make information available for others. The whole present of this information process is the need for knowledge. 55% of profusion all over the world comes from knowledge. Peter Druker even said that the most production growth happens with the increase of knowledge.Today, communication has become more than just a angiotensin-converting enzyme-on- single process. With information coming from sources of all directions, intelligence has become collective. The internet is one viable process of communication that cannot be underestimated. Without any initial service of process from grownger companies, the internet reaches one billion users. It should be noted that information is distinguishable from knowledgeand knowledge is different from intelligence. Information hardly becomes knowledge when a user processes it. In the same way, intelligence is a collection of knowledge.Thus , a integrity piece of information is not knowledge until used, while a single piece of knowledge cannot be called intelligence unless other knowledge is grouped with it. (Idehen, 2004 Bates, 2005) Communication enabled a big shift for knowledge. Where before knowledge is from one point to another (1 to 1), with communication it has become one point to several receiving points (1 to n). Thus, it can be said that there is an increase in the efficiency of knowledge share by means of communication. Yet, the web age has also contributed more to this.Thus, the weave 1. 0 and Web 2. 0. In Web 1. 0, everybody is creating information (n to n). In response, everybody can access information too (n to n). Instead of a linear process, there is a cycle of information sharing happening to all involvedthe senders and receivers of information who are also receivers and senders in their respective rights. Web 1. 0 became an alternative way to communicate because of this efficiency that it offere d everybody. (Barefoot, 2006) It does not only get information, it also gives information in return. Web 2.0 Simplifying the Complicated aims to present how Web 2. 0 works. It creates a birds eye view of the commentarys. It also consults the processes of how Web 2. 0 is taking the web and its users. Effects, both good and bad, will also be analyzed. In the end, there is an attempt to conclude is Web 2. 0 hype or a formation that is here to stay? Literature Review The word Web 2. 0 was coined by Dale Dougherty in 2004. (Anderson, 2007) Since then, it has become a widely-used word. Experts are talking about Web 2. 0 as if it is a new revolution.Indeed, it is. The word Web 2. 0 has been used and abused by many. Singel (2005) quoted Tim OReilly who defined the term as the framework of participation for the purpose of information. Schindler (2007) agreed to this statement, defining Web 2. 0 as the collaborative internet. However, Boutin (2006) claimed that definitions to the word may c hange, depending on who is using the term. Thus, no single definition can be associated with it. Almost every netizen is already using the Web 2. 0 in one way or another. Anderson (2007) identified that the Web 2.0 is the use of collective information, where data is the chief element, among others. Thus, blogging, forums, tagging, and all other forms of publishing over the internet for public use may be regarded as Web 2. 0. Without one knowing it, Web 2. 0 is right before their very eyes. There have been questions, thus, if Web 2. 0 is hype, or a fad that will soon pass. Singel (2005) stated that the first conference held for Web 2. 0 was sold out despite the steep price tag. Schonfeld (2006) dismissed the idea of it being a publicity spin off. In fact, he claimed that the Web 2.0 is the current name of the internet game. notwithstanding the arguments, Web 2. 0 definitely has its positive effects. Companies view it as a way to save on marketing costs and improve customer relations . Businesses agree that the Web 2. 0 will impact their operations positively. These benefits, however, have corresponding detriments. (Serious business Web 2. 0 goes corporate 2007) Keen (2006) stated that the Web 2. 0 setup enables users to publish just about anything within the limits, and so it can give way to anyone who wants to be a writer or performer.Thus, the entertainment industry may be threatened. Singel (2005) dismissed this. He quoted privy Batelle who affirmed that despite the openness of Web 2. 0 for a new breed of entertainers, talent is one question that separates the real from the web-based. On the other hand, Harris (2006) expressed concerns to the loss of privacy because of the limitless sharing through Web 2. 0. Even mere personal files that get inside the Web 2. 0 is shared in a way, and he activities of users included, proving that privacy may in fact be sacrificed.Kantor (2006), however, stressed that copyright and limits will still be enforced, so that ther e is no need to worry about privacy. Despite the different views on Web 2. 0, it has become a fact that it is the way computing is currently being done. meshing users are getting the benefits, and are more than willing to participate. Internet companies are making waves for new Web 2. 0 applications and services. Businesses are turning their keys to include Web 2. 0 in their online presence. All these show that Web 2. 0 is definitely an issue worth discussing.